Skip to Content
Main content

HAMBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

164

20%

LEVEL 2

274

33%

LEVEL 3

260

31%

LEVEL 4

138

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

105

15%

LEVEL 2

197

28%

LEVEL 3

260

37%

LEVEL 4

134

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

79

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

372
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

154

20%

LEVEL 2

252

32%

LEVEL 3

241

31%

LEVEL 4

131

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

369
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

183

28%

LEVEL 3

242

37%

LEVEL 4

127

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 738

LEVEL 1

94

13%

LEVEL 2

251

34%

LEVEL 3

255

35%

LEVEL 4

138

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

56

9%

LEVEL 2

174

28%

LEVEL 3

257

42%

LEVEL 4

131

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

70

71%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

49

63%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

350
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

211

32%

LEVEL 3

221

33%

LEVEL 4

129

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

342
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

155

28%

LEVEL 3

223

40%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.