IROQUOIS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

158

35%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

148

36%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

87

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

34

57%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

76

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

41

44%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.