Skip to Content
Main content

EAST AURORA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

111

32%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

65

42%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.