Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEASTERN CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

134

36%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

80

45%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

88

29%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

87

48%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.