Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

219

37%

LEVEL 2

222

38%

LEVEL 3

113

19%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

178

33%

LEVEL 2

211

39%

LEVEL 3

123

23%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

208

37%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

171

33%

LEVEL 2

202

39%

LEVEL 3

119

23%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

140

28%

LEVEL 2

209

42%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

200

43%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

79

85%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

66

84%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

136

45%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

125

42%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.