Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

86

30%

LEVEL 2

121

43%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

72

46%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

69

48%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

114

48%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

37

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

62

47%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.