OXFORD ACADEMY & CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

69

44%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

46

31%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

34

81%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

29

78%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

58

46%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.