Skip to Content
Main content

BROADWAY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

219

58%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

86

52%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

133

62%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

99

57%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

157

54%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

124

44%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

45

74%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

169

53%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

50

88%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

44

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

78

47%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

141

67%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

126

58%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.