Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTHWESTERN CSD AT JAMESTOWN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

156

29%

LEVEL 2

189

35%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

55

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

145

27%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

141

29%

LEVEL 2

174

35%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

129

26%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

101

21%

LEVEL 2

181

38%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

55

82%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

60

85%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

89

49%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

88

45%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.