Skip to Content
Main content

A A GATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

67

50%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

27

43%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

39

42%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

20

91%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

16

84%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

37

46%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.