AUBURN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

140

54%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

124

52%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

55

52%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

53

48%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

85

56%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

71

55%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

90

47%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

17

85%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

96

46%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

103

66%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

96

69%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.