AUBURN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,014

LEVEL 1

545

54%

LEVEL 2

321

32%

LEVEL 3

123

12%

LEVEL 4

25

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,122

LEVEL 1

575

51%

LEVEL 2

351

31%

LEVEL 3

165

15%

LEVEL 4

31

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

230

50%

LEVEL 2

150

33%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

237

47%

LEVEL 2

168

33%

LEVEL 3

86

17%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

315

56%

LEVEL 2

171

31%

LEVEL 3

64

11%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

338

55%

LEVEL 2

183

30%

LEVEL 3

79

13%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

78

67%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

399

51%

LEVEL 2

260

33%

LEVEL 3

105

13%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 855

LEVEL 1

402

47%

LEVEL 2

283

33%

LEVEL 3

143

17%

LEVEL 4

27

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

55

73%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

57

78%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

34

51%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 861

LEVEL 1

400

46%

LEVEL 2

316

37%

LEVEL 3

120

14%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 964

LEVEL 1

428

44%

LEVEL 2

344

36%

LEVEL 3

162

17%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

145

95%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

147

93%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

119

28%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

426

66%

LEVEL 2

171

26%

LEVEL 3

45

7%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

456

65%

LEVEL 2

191

27%

LEVEL 3

48

7%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.