SALAMANCA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

263

56%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

59

12%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

226

52%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

86

43%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

164

63%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

140

60%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

122

59%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

88

53%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

126

53%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

117

51%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

211

51%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

170

46%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

52

91%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

56

90%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

48

40%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

65

42%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

215

61%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

161

58%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.