PORTVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

150

33%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

103

23%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

117

27%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

78

34%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

97

45%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

143

34%

LEVEL 2

151

35%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

159

40%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

41

85%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

35

78%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.