Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

122

36%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

113

34%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

85

47%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.