Skip to Content
Main content

TIOUGHNIOGA RIVERSIDE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

141

33%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

104

49%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

87

42%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

162

41%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

162

40%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

161

44%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

61

91%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

51

86%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

139

54%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

113

42%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.