Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

182

29%

LEVEL 2

226

36%

LEVEL 3

154

24%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

174

27%

LEVEL 2

227

36%

LEVEL 3

169

26%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

162

28%

LEVEL 2

211

36%

LEVEL 3

143

25%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

152

26%

LEVEL 2

209

36%

LEVEL 3

158

27%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

211

40%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

74

15%

LEVEL 2

203

40%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

89

83%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

100

78%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.