Skip to Content
Main content

SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

249

43%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

138

26%

LEVEL 2

212

39%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

223

43%

LEVEL 3

123

23%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

117

24%

LEVEL 2

184

38%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

224

45%

LEVEL 3

130

26%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

86

18%

LEVEL 2

203

43%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

48

64%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

52

83%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.