Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

203

45%

LEVEL 2

183

41%

LEVEL 3

47

11%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

160

36%

LEVEL 2

184

42%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

92

42%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

104

44%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

111

49%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

89

44%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

198

47%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

156

37%

LEVEL 2

174

42%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

165

42%

LEVEL 2

171

43%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

141

34%

LEVEL 2

173

42%

LEVEL 3

82

20%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

38

75%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

192

46%

LEVEL 2

166

40%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

151

36%

LEVEL 2

177

43%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.