Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX CS FOR EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

171

44%

LEVEL 3

127

33%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

223

45%

LEVEL 4

99

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

109

43%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

88

46%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

84

46%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

110

49%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

68

50%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

66

39%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

208

47%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

21

53%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

166

44%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

319
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

220

46%

LEVEL 4

99

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

66

50%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

130

44%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.