Skip to Content
Main content

GORDON PARKS SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

106

24%

LEVEL 2

190

44%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

210

45%

LEVEL 3

129

28%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

95

48%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

102

47%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

136
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

186

44%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

179
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

202

45%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

177

50%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

182

47%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

60

77%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

108

48%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

133

49%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.