Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP TECH VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

139

48%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

129

45%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

87

51%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

75

45%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

54

45%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

68
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

116

47%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.