CHANNEL VIEW SCHOOL FOR RESEARCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

101

53%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

114

51%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

53

54%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

58

50%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

48

52%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

56

52%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

41

50%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

52

47%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

36

62%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

32

53%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

88

54%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

98

52%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

25

58%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

76

51%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

93

53%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.