KIPP AMP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

65

39%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

80

45%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

134

43%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

52

73%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

39

58%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

119

38%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

88

29%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.