Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BROWNSVILLE CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

103

24%

LEVEL 2

200

47%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

63

12%

LEVEL 2

219

42%

LEVEL 3

172

33%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

100

50%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

108

47%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

178

46%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

217
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

194

42%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

179

47%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

194

42%

LEVEL 3

162

35%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

26

41%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

33

49%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

43

49%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

88

24%

LEVEL 2

167

46%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.