Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS - HARLEM 3 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

134

25%

LEVEL 3

294

55%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

106

22%

LEVEL 3

262

53%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

156

56%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

211
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

139

55%

LEVEL 4

72

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

138

54%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

123

51%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

258
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

202

58%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

238
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

166

54%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

118
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

82

49%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

88

55%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

103

22%

LEVEL 3

272

57%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

230

55%

LEVEL 4

110

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

31

53%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

32

43%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

374
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

106

22%

LEVEL 3

257

53%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

66

56%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

103

52%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

228

54%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

159

54%

LEVEL 4

67

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.