Skip to Content
Main content

EQUITY PROJECT CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

203

43%

LEVEL 2

189

40%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

149

32%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

88

37%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

114

45%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

115

49%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

185

43%

LEVEL 2

173

40%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

140

32%

LEVEL 2

193

44%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

175

47%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

57

65%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

60

61%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

126

33%

LEVEL 2

172

46%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

173

47%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

77

81%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

71

68%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

23

51%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

190

44%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

187

44%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.