Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX ACADEMY-MULTI-MEDIA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

190

64%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

163

59%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

86

61%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

104

66%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

91

65%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

129

62%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

121

58%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

114

55%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

76

85%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

59

79%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

139

57%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

109

51%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

51

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

54

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

176

64%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

152

59%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.