Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

128

41%

LEVEL 4

147

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

59

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

94

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

40

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

72

49%

LEVEL 4

53

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

17

46%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

26

45%

LEVEL 4

28

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

78

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

91

42%

LEVEL 4

101

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

107

42%

LEVEL 4

124

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

23

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.