Skip to Content
Main content

DR R IZQUIERDO HEALTH/SCIENCE CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

186

49%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

216

55%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

112

60%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

105

54%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

104

51%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

72

51%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

73

57%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

111

48%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

141

57%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

143

45%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

191

59%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

156

45%

LEVEL 2

153

44%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

206

59%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

28

72%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

177

50%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

207

55%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.