Skip to Content
Main content

EXPLORE EXCEL CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

55

47%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

67

45%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

64

50%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

64

43%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

97

44%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

86

46%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

43

74%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

47

67%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

100

42%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

91

32%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

19

32%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

87

44%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

102

43%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.