ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN ELEMEN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

179

52%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

143

42%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

73

42%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

64

37%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

106

62%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

172

52%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

137

43%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

127

44%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

52

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

46

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

38

34%

LEVEL 2

56

50%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

141

62%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

111

50%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.