Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL VALLEY CSD AT ILION-MOHAWK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

237

38%

LEVEL 2

232

37%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

251

36%

LEVEL 2

264

38%

LEVEL 3

143

20%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

146

48%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

154

45%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

227

39%

LEVEL 2

216

37%

LEVEL 3

106

18%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

236

36%

LEVEL 2

250

38%

LEVEL 3

134

20%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

221

43%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

154

26%

LEVEL 2

256

43%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

91

88%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

97

91%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

163

44%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

183

46%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.