MONROE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,228
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,778

LEVEL 1

12,200

35%

LEVEL 2

10,350

30%

LEVEL 3

8,069

23%

LEVEL 4

4,159

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,443
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,085

LEVEL 1

11,926

34%

LEVEL 2

10,716

31%

LEVEL 3

8,071

23%

LEVEL 4

4,372

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,901
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,010

LEVEL 1

5,090

30%

LEVEL 2

5,019

30%

LEVEL 3

4,313

25%

LEVEL 4

2,588

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7,061
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,142

LEVEL 1

4,896

29%

LEVEL 2

5,185

30%

LEVEL 3

4,312

25%

LEVEL 4

2,749

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,327
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,768

LEVEL 1

7,110

40%

LEVEL 2

5,331

30%

LEVEL 3

3,756

21%

LEVEL 4

1,571

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,382
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,943

LEVEL 1

7,030

39%

LEVEL 2

5,531

31%

LEVEL 3

3,759

21%

LEVEL 4

1,623

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

478
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,041

LEVEL 1

249

24%

LEVEL 2

314

30%

LEVEL 3

316

30%

LEVEL 4

162

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

501
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,131

LEVEL 1

245

22%

LEVEL 2

385

34%

LEVEL 3

311

27%

LEVEL 4

190

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

27

42%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

835
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,676

LEVEL 1

395

24%

LEVEL 2

446

27%

LEVEL 3

498

30%

LEVEL 4

337

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

785
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,631

LEVEL 1

414

25%

LEVEL 2

432

26%

LEVEL 3

418

26%

LEVEL 4

367

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,910
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,365

LEVEL 1

3,072

18%

LEVEL 2

5,383

31%

LEVEL 3

5,667

33%

LEVEL 4

3,243

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,864
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,417

LEVEL 1

2,963

17%

LEVEL 2

5,590

32%

LEVEL 3

5,550

32%

LEVEL 4

3,314

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,189
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,543

LEVEL 1

5,643

59%

LEVEL 2

2,711

28%

LEVEL 3

950

10%

LEVEL 4

239

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,366
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,580

LEVEL 1

5,414

57%

LEVEL 2

2,800

29%

LEVEL 3

1,093

11%

LEVEL 4

273

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

804
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,088

LEVEL 1

2,814

55%

LEVEL 2

1,470

29%

LEVEL 3

627

12%

LEVEL 4

177

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

916
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,274

LEVEL 1

2,871

54%

LEVEL 2

1,487

28%

LEVEL 3

692

13%

LEVEL 4

224

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,054
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,454

LEVEL 1

8,699

29%

LEVEL 2

9,701

32%

LEVEL 3

7,913

26%

LEVEL 4

4,141

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,223
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,628

LEVEL 1

8,500

28%

LEVEL 2

9,905

32%

LEVEL 3

7,893

26%

LEVEL 4

4,330

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

174
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,324

LEVEL 1

3,501

81%

LEVEL 2

649

15%

LEVEL 3

156

4%

LEVEL 4

18

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

220
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,457

LEVEL 1

3,426

77%

LEVEL 2

811

18%

LEVEL 3

178

4%

LEVEL 4

42

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,193
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,881

LEVEL 1

10,625

32%

LEVEL 2

10,063

31%

LEVEL 3

8,036

24%

LEVEL 4

4,157

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,407
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,048

LEVEL 1

10,280

31%

LEVEL 2

10,361

31%

LEVEL 3

8,039

24%

LEVEL 4

4,368

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,897

LEVEL 1

1,575

83%

LEVEL 2

287

15%

LEVEL 3

33

2%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,037

LEVEL 1

1,646

81%

LEVEL 2

355

17%

LEVEL 3

32

2%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,370
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,777

LEVEL 1

2,400

14%

LEVEL 2

5,007

30%

LEVEL 3

5,820

35%

LEVEL 4

3,550

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,408
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,352

LEVEL 1

2,640

15%

LEVEL 2

5,304

31%

LEVEL 3

5,731

33%

LEVEL 4

3,677

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,858
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,001

LEVEL 1

9,800

54%

LEVEL 2

5,343

30%

LEVEL 3

2,249

12%

LEVEL 4

609

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,035
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,733

LEVEL 1

9,286

52%

LEVEL 2

5,412

31%

LEVEL 3

2,340

13%

LEVEL 4

695

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

12,226
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,763

LEVEL 1

12,191

35%

LEVEL 2

10,346

30%

LEVEL 3

8,067

23%

LEVEL 4

4,159

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

12,441
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,071

LEVEL 1

11,915

34%

LEVEL 2

10,715

31%

LEVEL 3

8,069

23%

LEVEL 4

4,372

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.