Skip to Content
Main content

NASSAU COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,858
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51,032

LEVEL 1

9,364

18%

LEVEL 2

15,810

31%

LEVEL 3

16,714

33%

LEVEL 4

9,144

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,830
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 50,800

LEVEL 1

8,506

17%

LEVEL 2

15,464

30%

LEVEL 3

16,858

33%

LEVEL 4

9,972

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14,006
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,612

LEVEL 1

3,452

14%

LEVEL 2

7,154

29%

LEVEL 3

8,588

35%

LEVEL 4

5,418

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14,453
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,497

LEVEL 1

3,154

13%

LEVEL 2

6,890

28%

LEVEL 3

8,581

35%

LEVEL 4

5,872

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11,852
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,420

LEVEL 1

5,912

22%

LEVEL 2

8,656

33%

LEVEL 3

8,126

31%

LEVEL 4

3,726

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12,377
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,303

LEVEL 1

5,352

20%

LEVEL 2

8,574

33%

LEVEL 3

8,277

31%

LEVEL 4

4,100

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

460
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

91

12%

LEVEL 2

222

29%

LEVEL 3

290

38%

LEVEL 4

170

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

519
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

83

10%

LEVEL 2

229

28%

LEVEL 3

300

36%

LEVEL 4

219

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

42
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,871
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,700

LEVEL 1

642

7%

LEVEL 2

2,187

23%

LEVEL 3

3,777

39%

LEVEL 4

3,094

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7,268
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,117

LEVEL 1

671

7%

LEVEL 2

2,178

22%

LEVEL 3

3,781

37%

LEVEL 4

3,487

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11,901
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,547

LEVEL 1

1,940

10%

LEVEL 2

5,706

29%

LEVEL 3

7,709

39%

LEVEL 4

4,192

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12,072
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,175

LEVEL 1

1,612

8%

LEVEL 2

5,491

29%

LEVEL 3

7,662

40%

LEVEL 4

4,410

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,686
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,739

LEVEL 1

2,243

29%

LEVEL 2

2,810

36%

LEVEL 3

1,944

25%

LEVEL 4

742

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,737
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,393

LEVEL 1

1,955

26%

LEVEL 2

2,701

37%

LEVEL 3

1,959

26%

LEVEL 4

778

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,897
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,173

LEVEL 1

4,427

34%

LEVEL 2

4,849

37%

LEVEL 3

2,964

23%

LEVEL 4

933

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,192
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,194

LEVEL 1

4,169

32%

LEVEL 2

4,833

37%

LEVEL 3

3,124

24%

LEVEL 4

1,068

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,332
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,032

LEVEL 1

6,306

14%

LEVEL 2

14,394

31%

LEVEL 3

16,275

35%

LEVEL 4

9,057

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,253
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,196

LEVEL 1

6,015

13%

LEVEL 2

13,928

30%

LEVEL 3

16,373

35%

LEVEL 4

9,880

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

526
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,000

LEVEL 1

3,058

61%

LEVEL 2

1,416

28%

LEVEL 3

439

9%

LEVEL 4

87

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

577
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,604

LEVEL 1

2,491

54%

LEVEL 2

1,536

33%

LEVEL 3

485

11%

LEVEL 4

92

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25,724
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,615

LEVEL 1

6,830

14%

LEVEL 2

15,061

32%

LEVEL 3

16,588

35%

LEVEL 4

9,136

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26,597
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,914

LEVEL 1

5,919

13%

LEVEL 2

14,398

31%

LEVEL 3

16,640

35%

LEVEL 4

9,957

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,417

LEVEL 1

2,534

74%

LEVEL 2

749

22%

LEVEL 3

126

4%

LEVEL 4

8

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

233
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,886

LEVEL 1

2,587

67%

LEVEL 2

1,066

27%

LEVEL 3

218

6%

LEVEL 4

15

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,562
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,609

LEVEL 1

3,671

11%

LEVEL 2

9,376

28%

LEVEL 3

12,732

38%

LEVEL 4

7,830

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,347
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,958

LEVEL 1

3,376

10%

LEVEL 2

9,235

27%

LEVEL 3

12,812

38%

LEVEL 4

8,535

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,296
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,423

LEVEL 1

5,693

33%

LEVEL 2

6,434

37%

LEVEL 3

3,982

23%

LEVEL 4

1,314

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,483
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,842

LEVEL 1

5,130

30%

LEVEL 2

6,229

37%

LEVEL 3

4,046

24%

LEVEL 4

1,437

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.