QUEENS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54,638
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 125,424

LEVEL 1

26,833

21%

LEVEL 2

43,953

35%

LEVEL 3

35,660

28%

LEVEL 4

18,978

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57,620
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 126,437

LEVEL 1

26,830

21%

LEVEL 2

41,987

33%

LEVEL 3

35,886

28%

LEVEL 4

21,734

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30,404
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 61,028

LEVEL 1

9,970

16%

LEVEL 2

20,654

34%

LEVEL 3

19,040

31%

LEVEL 4

11,364

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31,923
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 61,582

LEVEL 1

10,019

16%

LEVEL 2

19,640

32%

LEVEL 3

18,954

31%

LEVEL 4

12,969

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24,234
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 64,396

LEVEL 1

16,863

26%

LEVEL 2

23,299

36%

LEVEL 3

16,620

26%

LEVEL 4

7,614

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25,697
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 64,855

LEVEL 1

16,811

26%

LEVEL 2

22,347

34%

LEVEL 3

16,932

26%

LEVEL 4

8,765

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

457
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

99

13%

LEVEL 2

212

28%

LEVEL 3

258

34%

LEVEL 4

199

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

610
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,008

LEVEL 1

134

13%

LEVEL 2

264

26%

LEVEL 3

305

30%

LEVEL 4

305

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

734
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,993

LEVEL 1

470

24%

LEVEL 2

789

40%

LEVEL 3

514

26%

LEVEL 4

220

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

882
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,233

LEVEL 1

537

24%

LEVEL 2

814

36%

LEVEL 3

612

27%

LEVEL 4

270

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22,305
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,860

LEVEL 1

4,292

12%

LEVEL 2

10,263

28%

LEVEL 3

12,840

35%

LEVEL 4

9,465

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23,511
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,626

LEVEL 1

4,306

11%

LEVEL 2

9,809

26%

LEVEL 3

12,545

33%

LEVEL 4

10,966

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,064
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,381

LEVEL 1

2,335

14%

LEVEL 2

4,982

30%

LEVEL 3

5,438

33%

LEVEL 4

3,626

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,219
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,077

LEVEL 1

2,253

14%

LEVEL 2

4,605

29%

LEVEL 3

5,332

33%

LEVEL 4

3,887

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6,631
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,164

LEVEL 1

6,591

30%

LEVEL 2

8,942

40%

LEVEL 3

5,050

23%

LEVEL 4

1,581

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6,852
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,561

LEVEL 1

6,379

30%

LEVEL 2

8,330

39%

LEVEL 3

5,018

23%

LEVEL 4

1,834

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15,447
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,258

LEVEL 1

13,046

28%

LEVEL 2

18,765

40%

LEVEL 3

11,560

24%

LEVEL 4

3,887

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16,546
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,932

LEVEL 1

13,221

28%

LEVEL 2

18,165

38%

LEVEL 3

12,074

25%

LEVEL 4

4,472

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52,376
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 102,910

LEVEL 1

14,095

14%

LEVEL 2

36,439

35%

LEVEL 3

33,706

33%

LEVEL 4

18,670

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55,216
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 104,222

LEVEL 1

14,539

14%

LEVEL 2

34,467

33%

LEVEL 3

33,826

32%

LEVEL 4

21,390

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,262
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,514

LEVEL 1

12,738

57%

LEVEL 2

7,514

33%

LEVEL 3

1,954

9%

LEVEL 4

308

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,404
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,215

LEVEL 1

12,291

55%

LEVEL 2

7,520

34%

LEVEL 3

2,060

9%

LEVEL 4

344

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53,949
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 112,507

LEVEL 1

18,522

16%

LEVEL 2

40,036

36%

LEVEL 3

35,030

31%

LEVEL 4

18,919

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56,652
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 112,014

LEVEL 1

17,950

16%

LEVEL 2

37,412

33%

LEVEL 3

34,980

31%

LEVEL 4

21,672

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

689
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,917

LEVEL 1

8,311

64%

LEVEL 2

3,917

30%

LEVEL 3

630

5%

LEVEL 4

59

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

968
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,423

LEVEL 1

8,880

62%

LEVEL 2

4,575

32%

LEVEL 3

906

6%

LEVEL 4

62

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,007
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 38,372

LEVEL 1

5,955

16%

LEVEL 2

11,410

30%

LEVEL 3

12,364

32%

LEVEL 4

8,643

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22,638
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 40,193

LEVEL 1

6,146

15%

LEVEL 2

11,409

28%

LEVEL 3

12,685

32%

LEVEL 4

9,953

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,631
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 87,052

LEVEL 1

20,878

24%

LEVEL 2

32,543

37%

LEVEL 3

23,296

27%

LEVEL 4

10,335

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34,982
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 86,244

LEVEL 1

20,684

24%

LEVEL 2

30,578

35%

LEVEL 3

23,201

27%

LEVEL 4

11,781

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.