Skip to Content
Main content

YATES COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

247

35%

LEVEL 2

287

40%

LEVEL 3

141

20%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

269

38%

LEVEL 2

259

36%

LEVEL 3

148

21%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

152

43%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

165

45%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

225

35%

LEVEL 2

267

41%

LEVEL 3

124

19%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

248

38%

LEVEL 2

238

36%

LEVEL 3

139

21%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

144

25%

LEVEL 2

256

44%

LEVEL 3

139

24%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

170

29%

LEVEL 2

238

40%

LEVEL 3

146

25%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

103

76%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

99

81%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

208

48%

LEVEL 2

154

35%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.