Skip to Content
Main content

GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

132

34%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

129

34%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

123

31%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

70

84%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

53

70%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

88

43%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.