LIVONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

132

23%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

186

32%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

113

20%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

179

31%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

118

21%

LEVEL 2

182

33%

LEVEL 3

182

33%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

193

36%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

77

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

184

35%

LEVEL 4

77

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

183

35%

LEVEL 3

177

34%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

38

75%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

137

36%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

137

37%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.