Skip to Content
Main content

MANCHESTER-SHORTSVILLE CSD (RED JACK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

105

40%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

55

45%

LEVEL 2

59

48%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

67

49%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

94

40%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

105

49%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

32

84%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

34

89%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

49

42%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

64

49%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.