PEMBROKE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

83

45%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

131

44%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

38

62%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

51

34%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.