Skip to Content
Main content

BYRON-BERGEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

77

40%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.