Skip to Content
Main content

BYRAM HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

584
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

52

6%

LEVEL 2

200

24%

LEVEL 3

340

41%

LEVEL 4

244

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

605
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 886

LEVEL 1

55

6%

LEVEL 2

226

26%

LEVEL 3

408

46%

LEVEL 4

197

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

315
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

90

21%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

323
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

96

22%

LEVEL 3

211

48%

LEVEL 4

112

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

269
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

166

40%

LEVEL 4

103

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

282
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

197

45%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

30

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

36

51%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

497
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

44

6%

LEVEL 2

173

24%

LEVEL 3

305

43%

LEVEL 4

192

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

502
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

46

6%

LEVEL 2

193

26%

LEVEL 3

334

45%

LEVEL 4

168

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

17

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

25

48%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

567
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 740

LEVEL 1

16

2%

LEVEL 2

157

21%

LEVEL 3

327

44%

LEVEL 4

240

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

588
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

17

2%

LEVEL 2

172

22%

LEVEL 3

392

50%

LEVEL 4

196

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

38

35%

LEVEL 2

54

50%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

566
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 808

LEVEL 1

47

6%

LEVEL 2

195

24%

LEVEL 3

326

40%

LEVEL 4

240

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

591
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

50

6%

LEVEL 2

218

25%

LEVEL 3

396

46%

LEVEL 4

195

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

14

50%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.