Skip to Content
Main content

H C CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

177

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

83

21%

LEVEL 3

172

43%

LEVEL 4

126

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

108

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

76

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

69

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

18

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

16

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

144

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

106

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

174

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

62

17%

LEVEL 3

165

46%

LEVEL 4

125

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

21

51%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

173

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

291
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

77

20%

LEVEL 3

166

43%

LEVEL 4

125

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.