Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

190

40%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

186

36%

LEVEL 2

182

35%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

117

48%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

116

44%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

154

36%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

159

35%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

133

32%

LEVEL 2

154

37%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

130

29%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

57

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

56

84%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

149
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

181

36%

LEVEL 2

179

35%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

163

53%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

154

47%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

128
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

187

39%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

148
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

182

36%

LEVEL 2

181

35%

LEVEL 3

102

20%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.