NEWARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

142

42%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

135

42%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

81

49%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

81

46%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

92

37%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

114

37%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

67
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

131

41%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

52

43%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

115

55%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

103

51%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.