Skip to Content
Main content

HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 788

LEVEL 1

299

38%

LEVEL 2

290

37%

LEVEL 3

166

21%

LEVEL 4

33

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 877

LEVEL 1

287

33%

LEVEL 2

338

39%

LEVEL 3

207

24%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

115

31%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

118

27%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

184

45%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

169

38%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

98

22%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

267

38%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

150

21%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

255

33%

LEVEL 2

302

39%

LEVEL 3

179

23%

LEVEL 4

42

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

20

48%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

169

27%

LEVEL 2

268

43%

LEVEL 3

160

25%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

157

23%

LEVEL 2

287

42%

LEVEL 3

200

29%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

130

82%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

130

69%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

209

48%

LEVEL 2

151

35%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

224

43%

LEVEL 2

201

38%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.