Skip to Content
Main content

TIOGA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

32

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

94

52%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

67

38%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.