Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

153

41%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

127

32%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

73

37%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

118

31%

LEVEL 2

145

38%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

146

45%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

40

80%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

53

84%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

95

40%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.