Skip to Content
Main content

CANDOR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

148

49%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

70

44%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

71

47%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

86

61%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

62

47%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

135

49%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

98

40%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

113

48%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

50

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

41

80%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

56

39%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

70

51%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

92

60%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

79

53%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.